Evidentic tests what is really happening beneath ERP programme status reports — and identifies the conditions, interactions and emerging patterns that matter most.
A structured, proprietary assurance methodology combining evidence validation, cross-domain analysis and expert judgement.
Traditional programme reporting is very good at telling executives what the programme currently believes about itself. That isn't the same as assurance.
The Evidentic Score provides an executive-level measure of programme health, supported by diagnostic analysis beneath it.
But the score isn't the diagnosis. A condition that appears manageable in isolation can become critical when it interacts with problems elsewhere in the programme.
They fail because problems interact.
Evidentic looks for the pattern, not just the individual findings.
A 30-question executive diagnostic designed to identify potential warning signals in an ERP programme.
It won't perform an independent assurance review. It will tell you whether there are reasons to look deeper.
Pulse combines health, evidence visibility and interaction signals rather than returning a simple questionnaire percentage.
The full methodology combines structured programme analysis, documentary evidence, stakeholder interviews and expert review to establish:
Critical client-side delivery responsibilities are being performed or implicitly owned by the SI.
Reduced independent challenge, unclear accountability and increased delivery dependency.
Explore a sample Evidentic assessmentEvidentic was developed by Anthony Riches, an independent ERP programme director and assurance specialist with more than 25 years' experience of ERP programme delivery, including 14 years directing programmes from the systems-integrator side.
It is designed from experience of both how ERP programmes are supposed to work — and how they actually go wrong.